Christian Watson for Lance McCutcheon (2024)
Should I Trade (PPR)... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT |   | |
Most Accurate Experts | |||
Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts | See who the Most Accurate Experts would trade Upgrade Now | ||
Rankings | |||
Rest of Season | # 50 | ‐ | - |
Week 8 | # 52 | ‐ | - |
Matchup | |||
Opponent | at JAC | vs. NYG | - |
Matchup Rating | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs JAC | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
Fantasy Points | |||
Season Total | 36.3 | 0.0 | - |
Avg Game | 6.1 | ‐ | - |
Avg Projection | 176.5 | ‐ | - |
Schedule | |||
SOS Rank | 6 | 5 | - |
Misc | |||
Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
Expert Ranks | |||
|
Christian Watson | Lance McCutcheon | Add Player |
10/22 | #42 | ‐ | - |
10/22 | #49 | ‐ | - |
10/21 | #62 | ‐ | - |
10/19 | #62 | ‐ | - |
10/18 | #41 | ‐ | - |
10/18 | #49 | ‐ | - |
10/17 | #56 | ‐ | - |
10/17 | #53 | ‐ | - |
10/17 | #53 | ‐ | - |
10/16 | #56 | ‐ | - |
10/16 | #43 | ‐ | - |
10/16 | #46 | ‐ | - |
10/16 | #54 | ‐ | - |
10/17 | #69 | ‐ | - |
10/13 | #54 | ‐ | - |
10/13 | #70 | ‐ | - |
10/12 | #58 | ‐ | - |
10/10 | #62 | ‐ | - |
10/09 | #50 | ‐ | - |
10/09 | #54 | ‐ | - |
10/05 | #63 | ‐ | - |
09/29 | #45 | ‐ | - |
09/28 | #46 | #232 | - |
09/27 | #44 | ‐ | - |
09/19 | #50 | ‐ | - |
09/18 | #43 | ‐ | - |
09/17 | #43 | ‐ | - |
09/17 | #54 | ‐ | - |
09/14 | #45 | ‐ | - |
09/11 | #45 | ‐ | - |
09/06 | #44 | ‐ | - |
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT | |
2024 Schedule | ||
Week 1 | at PHI | at ATL |
Week 2 | vs. IND | at DEN |
Week 3 | at TEN | vs. LAC |
Week 4 | vs. MIN | at IND |
Week 5 | at LAR | vs. DAL |
Week 6 | vs. ARI | at LV |
Week 7 | vs. HOU | vs. NYJ |
Week 8 | at JAC | vs. NYG |
Week 9 | vs. DET | BYE WEEK |
Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at WAS |
Week 11 | at CHI | vs. BAL |
Week 12 | vs. SF | at CLE |
Week 13 | vs. MIA | at CIN |
Week 14 | at DET | vs. CLE |
Week 15 | at SEA | at PHI |
Week 16 | vs. NO | at BAL |
Week 17 | at MIN | vs. KC |
Week 18 | vs. CHI | vs. CIN |
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT | |
Receiving | ||
Receptions | 53.7 | ‐ |
Rec Yards | 779.6 | ‐ |
Rec TDs | 7.0 | ‐ |
Rushing | ||
Rush Attempts | 4.2 | ‐ |
Rush Yards | 24.6 | ‐ |
Rush TDs | 0.3 | ‐ |
Points | ||
Fantasy Points | 176.5 | ‐ |
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT | |
2024 Points | ||
Week 1 | 10.3 | ‐ |
Week 2 | 0.0 | ‐ |
Week 3 | 8.7 | ‐ |
Week 4 | 0.0 | ‐ |
Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 6 | 15.8 | ‐ |
Week 7 | 1.5 | ‐ |
Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
Total | 36.3 | 0.0 |
Average | 6.1 | ‐ |
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT | |
2024 Targets | ||
Week 1 | 5 | ‐ |
Week 2 | 0 | ‐ |
Week 3 | 2 | ‐ |
Week 4 | 1 | ‐ |
Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 6 | 4 | ‐ |
Week 7 | 2 | ‐ |
Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
Christian Watson WR - GB Christian Watson WR - GB | Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT Lance McCutcheon WR - PIT | |
Expert | ||
Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | 30 air yards, 10.10% air yards share, 6.06% target share for Christian Watson. Watson is going to be difficult to trust as anything more than a boom-or-bust WR3. He split snaps and routes with Dontayvion Wicks healthy and back in the lineup. Given that we have all 32 teams playing next week and GB has a Week 10 bye, I don't feel the need to hold onto either Wicks/Watson in such a volatile role. One might hit against the Jaguars, but it's hard to have confidence in which one it will be. |