Thor Nystrom has returned home after a busy week in Mobile. He recaps the Senior Bowl with the biggest winner and loser at each position group. Measurements in the tables below via the Senior Bowl’s weigh-in. Movement metrics provided by Zebra Tracking.
- 2023 Senior Bowl Guide
- 2023 Senior Bowl Preview: Offense
- 2023 Senior Bowl Preview: Defense
- 2023 Senior Bowl Primer: Dynasty Rookies to Know
- Senior Bowl QB Rankings, Breakdowns & Team Fits
- Senior Bowl RB Rankings, Breakdowns & Team Fits
- 2023 Senior Bowl: Dynasty Fantasy Football Rookies to Watch (Saturday)
Check out all of our 2023 NFL Draft Scouting Reports & Prospect Profiles
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Offense
Top Athletic Performers
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Position |
1 | 21.65 | Darius Rush | South Carolina | DB |
2 | 21.22 | Jakorian Bennett | Maryland | DB |
3 | 21.15 | Trey Palmer | Nebraska | WR |
4 | 20.24 | Tre Tucker | Cincinnati | WR |
5 | 20.19 | Tyjae Spears | Tulane | RB |
6 | 20.16 | Nathaniel Dell | Houston | WR |
7 | 20.12 | Isaiah Land | Florida A&M | LB |
8 | 20.05 | Luke Musgrave | Oregon St. | TE |
9 | 20.03 | Jayden Reed | Michigan St. | WR |
10 | 19.93 | Riley Moss | Iowa | DB |
11 | 19.92 | Xavier Hutchinson | Iowa St. | WR |
12 | 19.92 | Chase Brown | Illinois | RB |
13 | 19.9 | Michael Wilson | Stanford | WR |
14 | 19.89 | Jay Ward | LSU | DB |
15 | 19.89 | Evan Hull | Northwestern | RB |
Rank | Acceleration | Name | College | Position |
1 | 5.41 | Keidron Smith | Kentucky | DB |
2 | 5.24 | Tyrique Stevenson | Miami | DB |
3 | 5.24 | Kyu Blu Kelly | Stanford | DB |
4 | 5.23 | Mekhi Blackmon | USC | DB |
5 | 5.19 | Daiyan Henley | Washington St. | LB |
Rank | Deceleration | Name | College | Position |
1 | -6.04 | Trey Palmer | Nebraska | WR |
2 | -5.68 | Rejzohn Wright | Oregon St. | DB |
3 | -5.56 | Riley Moss | Iowa | DB |
4 | -5.51 | Michael Wilson | Stanford | WR |
5 | -5.48 | Jartavius Martin | Illinois | DB |
Rank | Yards traveled | Name | College | Position |
1 | 16516 | Ronnie Bell | Michigan | WR |
2 | 16174 | Grant Dubose | Charlotte | WR |
3 | 15719 | Sydney Brown | Illinois | DB |
4 | 14932 | Tre Tucker | Cincinatti | WR |
5 | 14924 | Rashee Rice | SMU | WR |
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Quarterbacks
Name | College | Height | Weight | Arm | Hand | Wing |
Clayton Tune | Houston | 6022 | 216 | 31 1/2 | 9 3/8 | 75 3/8 |
Hendon Hooker | Tennessee | 6035 | 208 | 32 3/4 | 10 1/2 | 79 |
Jake Haener | Fresno State | 6000 | 208 | 30 | 9 3/8 | 73 |
Jaren Hall | BYU | 6001 | 211 | 29 7/8 | 9 1/2 | 71 3/4 |
Malik Cunningham | Louisville | 5117 | 188 | 31 3/8 | 9 3/8 | 77 7/8 |
Max Duggan | TCU | 6010 | 204 | 30 3/8 | 9 7/8 | 73 3/4 |
Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | 6026 | 213 | 30 3/8 | 9 1/2 | 75 3/8 |
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Max acceleration | Max Deceleration | Explosive efforts | Yards traveled |
1 | 18.72 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | 3.82 | -3.68 | 4 | 5368 |
2 | 18.13 | Jaren Hall | BYU | 2.91 | -3.47 | 5 | 9168 |
3 | 16.89 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | 4.78 | -3.86 | 6 | 10165 |
4 | 16.52 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | 3.09 | -3.18 | 0 | 10349 |
5 | 15.12 | Clayton Tune | Houston | 4.31 | -3.26 | 3 | 9815 |
6 | 14.52 | Max Duggan | TCU | 2.93 | -3.58 | 2 | 10355 |
Rank | Longest Throw | Name | College | Position |
1 | 59.7 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
2 | 59.1 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
3 | 57.5 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
4 | 55.3 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
5 | 52.4 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
6 | 50.2 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
Rank | Average Air Distance | Name | College | Position |
1 | 20.2 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
2 | 19.8 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
3 | 19.7 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
4 | 19.7 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
5 | 19.1 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
6 | 18.7 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
Rank | Fastest mph out of hand | Name | College | Position |
1 | 76.8 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
2 | 76.2 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
3 | 74.1 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
4 | 73.5 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
5 | 73.4 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
6 | 70.4 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
Rank | Average initial air speed | Name | College | Position |
1 | 47.5 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
2 | 46.3 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
3 | 45.6 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
4 | 45.3 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
5 | 45 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
6 | 44 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
Rank | Highest spin rate | Name | College | Position |
1 | 739.2 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
2 | 716.3 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
3 | 710.7 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
4 | 681.1 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
5 | 676.7 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
6 | 620.5 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
Rank | Average spin rate | Name | College | Position |
1 | 553 | Malik Cunningham | Louisville | QB |
2 | 525.8 | Jake Haener | Fresno St. | QB |
3 | 514.4 | Tyson Bagent | Shepherd | QB |
4 | 510.6 | Clayton Tune | Houston | QB |
5 | 498.7 | Jaren Hall | BYU | QB |
6 | 398.6 | Max Duggan | TCU | QB |
Riser: Fresno State QB Jake Haener
Haener’s trophy case became a little more crowded after this past week – he was named the Senior Bowl game MVP, as well as the National Team’s QB Practice Player-of-Week by the National DB group.
Haener stood out head-and-shoulders above the other quarterbacks in Mobile. He showed up to Mobile and was exactly as advertised. Haener is small, he’s an average athlete, and his arm strength is mediocre.
But Haener makes the correct decision almost every single rep – steady, consistent, no surprises. He gets the ball out on time and on the hands, a zippy rhythm-thrower. Haener clearly has a strong command of any huddle he steps into, including ones filled with new faces as was the case at the Senior Bowl.
The biggest knock on Haener is something that isn’t going to change – he doesn’t have a howitzer for an arm. But Haener’s arm is stronger than advertised. It’s not a howitzer – but it’s not a wet noodle, either.
Reminded me in some ways of Bailey Zappe from last year’s Senior Bowl. We could tell from the first practice session that Zappe’s arm had more zip than we’d been led to believe. Same case with Haener – perhaps not to the same degree, but notable nonetheless.
Haener’s balls have juice within 20 yards of the line. His deep passes are max-effort rainbows – but he does an admirable job directing them, dropping high-percentage looks into buckets and sailing low-percentage shots towards the sideline, where the defender has much-lower odds of making a play on it.
Haener’s advanced footwork in particular shined in comparison to the undisciplined bases of other signal-callers at the event. His tape is strong — he’s one of this classes’ most decorated signal-callers. In this process – one where more quarterbacks returned to school due to NIL incentives – Haener could ultimately soar higher on the draft board than currently anticipated.
Somebody is going to have to fill in that Tier 3 behind consensus top-4 QBs Bryce Young, CJ Stroud, Will Levis, and Anthony Richardson. Haener is making a strong argument to be included in the shortlist behind those guys.
If you can work around arm strength limitations, Haener is going to run your system like clockwork. People want Stetson Bennett to be this class’ Brock Purdy. I think it’s Haener.
Faller: BYU QB Jaren Hall
Speaking of Bennett, he’s probably the biggest loser of the week at the quarterback position – simply because he bypassed the opportunity to impress amid the mediocre QB crop in Mobile, and was instead popped for public intoxication in the days leading up to Senior Bowl week.
But if we’re talking about the quarterbacks we saw, Hall has to be the biggest faller of the week. After measuring into the event at a disappointing 6’0 1/8 and 211 pounds, Hall’s practice week was littered with misfires and bad decisions.
The accuracy was off all week. You’d see Hall short-arm a pass that burned worms in front of an open receiver. Then you’d start to see him missing high. You’d see him place easy throws to uncovered receivers outside their frames, requiring them to cede YAC opportunities to retrieve it.
Hall had the worst accuracy in practice all week according to the charting of FantasyPros’ Crissy Froyd. Hall also had balls batted at the line, a potential concerning trend in lieu of his height.
His decision-making and field vision only exasperated the accuracy issue. On one particularly egregious interception in team drills, Hall misread the coverage and lolly-popped a ball right into the arms of a waiting defender who didn’t have to move to catch it.
Facing no pass-rush in an individual drill, Hall held the ball way too long, indecisive, and then had it squirt out of his hand as he finally cocked to throw.
Though Hall struggled, he did flash some of the physical tools that have made him an intriguing developmental possibility. Hall and Malik Cunningham were the only two quarterbacks recorded over 18 mph in max speed. And Hall did have a few eye-opening throws when his base was stable.
But whereas Haener’s arm appeared to be stronger than advertised, Hall’s didn’t have the zip I was hoping for. He finished last among quarterbacks in longest charted throw, and in the bottom-half of the group in average air distance, fastest ball speed out of hand, average initial air speed, highest spin rate, and average spin rate. This would have been an easier pill to swallow had these balls been hitting receivers on the hands.
Hall had a chance to seize a spot in that tier behind the top-4 consensus quarterbacks in the class. Instead, this week, he might have been bypassed on draft boards by Haener – at least.
And after such a lackluster showing, it was confusing that Hall elected not to play in the game, leaving Mobile on Friday afternoon. He’s a nice kid who still has fans in the NFL. But this was a missed opportunity.
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Running Backs
Name | College | Height | Weight | Arm | Hand | Wing |
Camerun Peoples | Appalachian State | 6015 | 215 | 33 | 9 5/8 | 78 7/8 |
Chase Brown | Illinois | 5094 | 215 | 31 1/8 | 9 7/8 | 74 5/8 |
Chris Rodriguez Jr. | Kentucky | 5110 | 224 | 30 5/8 | 8 3/4 | 74 1/4 |
Eric Gray | Oklahoma | 5094 | 210 | 30 1/4 | 9 1/8 | 71 3/4 |
Evan Hull | Northwestern | 5101 | 214 | 30 1/4 | 9 1/8 | 74 |
Kenny McIntosh | Georgia | 5117 | 210 | 30 5/8 | 9 | 76 5/8 |
Roschon Johnson | Texas | 6004 | 225 | 31 3/4 | 9 1/2 | 77 5/8 |
Tyjae Spears | Tulane | 5095 | 204 | 30 5/8 | 10 | 74 |
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Max acceleration | Max Deceleration | Explosive efforts | Yards traveled |
1 | 20.19 | Tyjae Spears | Tulane | 4.52 | -5.1 | 46 | 14255 |
2 | 19.92 | Chase Brown | Illinois | 3.72 | -4.19 | 41 | 12625 |
3 | 19.89 | Evan Hull | Northwestern | 4.04 | -3.98 | 31 | 13635 |
4 | 19.58 | Camerun Peoples | Appalachian St. | 3.91 | -4.09 | 15 | 11098 |
5 | 19.51 | Kenny McIntosh | Georgia | 4.51 | -5.39 | 58 | 11216 |
6 | 19.13 | Eric Gray | Oklahoma | 4.76 | -4.45 | 37 | 13743 |
7 | 18.17 | SaRodorick Thompson | Texas Tech | 4.01 | -4.11 | 31 | 6624 |
8 | 18 | Brayden Willis | Oklahoma | 3.84 | -4.92 | 47 | 12544 |
9 | 17.42 | Roschon Johnson | Texas | 3.15 | -4.09 | 2 | 4408 |
10 | 17.4 | Chris Rodriguez Jr. | Kentucky | 5.01 | -5.17 | 22 | 9162 |
Riser: Tulane RB Tyjae Spears
Flashed all week long. I think he’s the biggest winner of the event. NFL executives & scouts apparently agree — Spears was named Senior Bowl Practice Player-of-Week in their vote.
Spears’ strengths, obvious as they were on film, were equally obvious in Mobile. What impressed the most, arguably, was his addressing, one-by-one, the questions in his eval coming in. He turned some into myths.
The doubters said Spears was a durability concern (ACL in 2020). They said he had a skinny build that may not be able to handle the full load. They said he had questionable third-down utility besides. And that he didn’t play special teams.
First, Spears challenged the size question. He weighed into the event at 204 pounds – significantly higher than he’d ever been listed with Tulane at. Spears, who was listed this past season at 195 pounds, told Crissy Froyd and me on Wednesday morning that he played the bowl game against USC at 197 pounds.
Spears said he put on the extra seven pounds over the past four weeks in training. Don’t be surprised if he shows up to Indianapolis closer to 210 – the NFL’s size-threshold for running backs.
Secondly, and just as importantly, Spears showed he could retain his movement skills at the bigger size. He was easily the most explosive back in Mobile.
Third, Spears showed that he could be a value-add in an NFL passing offense. In Mobile, he displayed receiving chops that weren’t obvious on his film. It appears that may have just been a college usage thing.
Not only did Spears take profits with his easy pass-catching reps, but he showed route-running chops nobody gave him credit for. He went viral on Thursday for sending a linebacker into the shadow realm out of a route break during one-on-one drills.
Spears caught multiple balls outside his frame before seamlessly turning upfield. He must have dropped a ball at some point during the week. I just don’t remember him doing so. His hands appeared soft and reliable.
Spears’ next challenge is to prove to doctors in Indianapolis that his knee isn’t a long-term problem. And then, of course, to blow the roof off athletic testing. The latter seems like a foregone conclusion. If Spears checks both of those boxes, Day 2 is going to have to make room for him in April.
Faller: Illinois RB Chase Brown
I wasn’t as high on Brown coming into the event. But he fell beneath even my tepid expectations in Mobile. Whereas a guy like Spears showed that his lack of third-down utility in college may have been a usage thing, Brown proved that his own was endemic to his game.
Brown was rag-dolled in pass-pro drills. He didn’t look good as a receiver, either. Brown was unable to separate during his routes. In one-on-ones, defenders were consistently getting hands on balls thrown to him and crowding catch points when they weren’t. Brown simply doesn’t have the ball skills to make up for a lack of separation – he needs the clean catch point to make the play.
Brown had paddle-hands with the ball all week. He dropped freebie dump-offs in the pass game in addition to his ongoing struggles catching with bodies around him. He also had fumbling issues as a runner.
Brown’s collegiate tape showed a runner who feasts in the second- and third-levels. But he needs to get there to succeed. And the concern my colleague Derek Brown and I had coming in with him is we couldn’t project how he’d do that at the NFL-level barring the luck of playing behind the league’s best offensive line with a coaching staff that would use him perfectly.
Brown doesn’t break many tackles, and he’s not overly-gifted at making defenders miss in the hole. The running lanes he saw last season that allowed him to get a head of steam into the second-level weren’t available in Mobile. Because of that, Brown’s strengths were dormant during Senior Bowl week, while his weaknesses came to the fore.
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Wide Receivers
Name | College | Height | Weight | Arm | Hand | Wing |
Andrei Iosivas | Princeton | 6027 | 212 | 31 5/8 | 8 5/8 | 76 3/4 |
Derius Davis | TCU | 5084 | 168 | 28 5/8 | 7 5/8 | 68 3/4 |
Dontayvion Wicks | Virginia | 6015 | 212 | 32 3/4 | 10 | 80 1/4 |
Elijah Higgins | Stanford | 6025 | 228 | 32 1/8 | 10 1/2 | 77 3/4 |
Grant DuBose | Charlotte | 6023 | 204 | 31 7/8 | 9 1/2 | 77 3/8 |
Jalen Wayne | South Alabama | 6014 | 211 | 31 7/8 | 9 1/2 | 78 3/8 |
Jayden Reed | Michigan State | 5106 | 191 | 30 1/2 | 9 1/4 | 72 7/8 |
Jonathan Mingo | Mississippi | 6013 | 226 | 32 | 10 1/4 | 76 1/4 |
Michael Wilson | Stanford | 6015 | 216 | 31 | 9 7/8 | 74 |
Nathaniel Dell | Houston | 5083 | 163 | 30 1/8 | 8 7/8 | 72 3/4 |
Puka Nacua | BYU | 6012 | 206 | 31 7/8 | 9 3/8 | 75 3/8 |
Rashee Rice | Southern Methodist | 6004 | 200 | 32 1/8 | 9 1/2 | 77 1/4 |
Ronnie Bell | Michigan | 5112 | 192 | 31 1/8 | 9 1/2 | 75 |
Tre Tucker | Cincinnati | 5087 | 187 | 28 5/8 | 8 1/2 | 70 |
Trey Palmer | Nebraska | 6000 | 193 | 31 7/8 | 9 1/2 | 77 |
Xavier Hutchinson | Iowa State | 6017 | 207 | 31 | 9 | 74 3/4 |
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Max acceleration | Max Deceleration | Explosive efforts | Yards traveled |
1 | 21.15 | Trey Palmer | Nebraska | 4.24 | -6.04 | 84 | 14688 |
2 | 20.24 | Tre Tucker | Cincinnati | 4.6 | -5.12 | 50 | 14932 |
3 | 20.16 | Nathaniel Dell | Houston | 4.06 | -4.81 | 59 | 10315 |
4 | 20.03 | Jayden Reed | Michigan St. | 5.02 | -5.09 | 52 | 14288 |
5 | 19.92 | Xavier Hutchinson | Iowa St. | 4.73 | -5.38 | 50 | 13178 |
6 | 19.9 | Michael Wilson | Stanford | 4.56 | -5.51 | 82 | 14668 |
7 | 19.85 | Jalen Wayne | South Alabama | 4.15 | -5.09 | 62 | 13895 |
8 | 19.82 | Jonathan Mingo | Mississippi | 4.89 | -5.33 | 73 | 14632 |
9 | 19.66 | Derius Davis | TCU | 4.12 | -5.11 | 51 | 8970 |
10 | 19.56 | Ronnie Bell | Michigan | 4.93 | -5.43 | 61 | 16516 |
11 | 19.23 | Rashee Rice | SMU | 4.49 | -5.27 | 97 | 14924 |
12 | 19.12 | Grant Dubose | Charlotte | 4.92 | -5.32 | 68 | 16174 |
13 | 18.91 | Andrei Iosivas | Princeton | 3.76 | -5.28 | 55 | 12701 |
14 | 18.9 | Dontayvion Wicks | Virginia | 4.29 | -4.84 | 73 | 13763 |
15 | 18.23 | Elijah Higgins | Stanford | 4.29 | -5.33 | 61 | 12834 |
16 | 18.08 | Puka Nacua | BYU | 3.56 | -4.73 | 17 | 3739 |
Riser: Houston WR Tank Dell
The Senior Bowl is an event that doesn’t cater as well to all positions. Linebacker and safety are two where it is harder to get a read on prospect performance. The way that practices are set up also helps certain types of players more than others.
Dell has one of those skillsets that we thought would shine at the Senior Bowl. And boy did it.
Evaluators look forward to the one-on-one drills on the field in Mobile probably more than any other singular thing during the week. We didn’t see one player in college capable of defending Dell in space – it turns out we didn’t see one of those in Mobile, either.
For two days, Dell destroyed just about every corner with the audacity to line up across from him in the one-on-one drills. Dell’s movement skills are utterly unique – he can change directions as easily as you or I breathe.
Dell’s movement skills really need to be seen in person to be fully appreciated. Between the route-running chops and cheat-code agility, it’s impossible to stay with Dell in single coverage. Indeed, Dell’s natural separation skills made him an unfair assignment in practices.
By Wednesday, things had gotten comical. Corners lit up by Dell the day before had a new strategy. They started grabbing his jersey during route breaks in an effort to keep Dell within arm’s length – the new strategy was taking a penalty to move to the next rep.
Dell’s slight frame means he’s going to get jammed at the line in the NFL. Dell did have a hard time getting clean releases on Kansas State CB Julius Brents on Tuesday. Then again, so did everybody else.
Here’s the truth: If you don’t stymie Dell off the line, you’re in a world of trouble. You’re not staying with him downfield without a fistful of jersey. It just is what it is.
Dell pulled out of the event in advance of Thursday’s final practice session. He believed he had shown all he needed to show during Days 1-2. No argument here. He’ll be a Round 2 player on my board.
Similar in size to Tutu Atwell, Dell is not the same player. At Louisville, Atwell was a two-trick utility pony. Atwell either caught a screen and tried to create, or he was running a fly route. Defenses weren’t scared of Atwell in the intermediate sector.
Dell is not as straight-line fast, but he is far more skilled, and the objectively superior route-runner. In 2021, Dell posted a PFF receiving grade of 90+ at all four receiving depths. Last season, the only one he failed to do so was behind the line of scrimmage. In two-of-Atwell’s-three seasons on campus, he posted a 90+ grade at only one-of-four depths. The other season, his best, he did it in three-of-four.
Even at his size, Dell comes to the NFL as a proven killer at every sector of the collegiate field. And Dell’s jumbo production was no fluke. Over the last two seasons, against four P5 opponents and Cincy’s 2021 CFP team – all five went to bowls – Dell had 39 catches for 582 yards and three TD.
Keep in mind: Dell was the one man on Houston’s offense that defenses came into the game with a mandate to stop. They couldn’t. Even at Dell’s size, I don’t see a scenario where he drops out of Day 2. He is simply too skilled.
Faller: Michigan WR Ronnie Bell
Bell projects as a secondary receiver in the NFL. His film doesn’t wow you. But his reliability and attention to the details gave some hope that he could be a Draft Day value as a valued rotational piece to an NFL team’s receiving room.
He didn’t show that in Mobile.
Bell didn’t generate the sort of separation in one-on-ones that you were hoping for. Beyond that, Bell’s hands were extremely inconsistent in Mobile. He had multiple drops on balls that hit him on the hands.
Bell moves well and he looks the part. But between his issues securing the ball and separating, Bell did not have a good week in Mobile.
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Tight Ends
Name | College | Height | Weight | Arm | Hand | Wing |
Brayden Willis | Oklahoma | 6036 | 239 | 32 3/4 | 9 1/2 | 79 |
Cameron Latu | Alabama | 6042 | 248 | 32 | 9 1/2 | 79 1/4 |
Davis Allen | Clemson | 6054 | 246 | 32 | 10 1/8 | 78 3/4 |
Josh Whyle | Cincinnati | 6064 | 260 | 31 7/8 | 9 1/2 | 78 3/8 |
Luke Musgrave | Oregon State | 6054 | 255 | 32 5/8 | 10 1/2 | 79 3/4 |
Payne Durham | Purdue | 6050 | 258 | 33 1/4 | 9 1/2 | 80 3/4 |
Will Mallory | Miami | 6043 | 239 | 32 | 9 3/8 | 78 3/8 |
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Max acceleration | Max Deceleration | Explosive efforts | Yards traveled |
1 | 20.05 | Luke Musgrave | Oregon St. | 3.84 | -4.72 | 51 | 12532 |
2 | 18.92 | Will Mallory | Miami | 4.35 | -5.16 | 64 | 13145 |
3 | 18.23 | Cameron Latu | Alabama | 4.91 | -4.81 | 71 | 13632 |
4 | 17.23 | Josh Whyle | Cincinnati | 3.7 | -4.4 | 31 | 13579 |
5 | 16.78 | Payne Durham | Purdue | 3.45 | -4.16 | 18 | 13397 |
6 | 16.41 | Robert Soderholm | VMI | 2.14 | -3.39 | 3 | 6143 |
7 | 15.94 | Davis Allen | Clemson | 3.99 | -4.1 | 20 | 13471 |
8 | 15.79 | Alex Ward | UCF | 2.46 | -3.71 | 3 | 2024 |
Riser: Oregon State TE Luke Musgrave
Musgrave’s max speed of 20.05 mph is the fastest time Zebra has tracked for a tight end at the Senior Bowl during the five years it has done it. He’s the only tight end at the event during the tracking era to crack the 20 mph mark.
Musgrave didn’t blow me away in practices. But he was consistently solid. And Musgrave noticeably moved better than any other tight end in Mobile. Along every metric.
He’s smoother, he’s faster, his cuts are cleaner, he’s more fluid in space. Musgrave runs snappy routes, consistently creating throwing windows for his quarterbacks. He had some strong catches in Mobile this week. His hands weren’t perfect – but they were good enough.
Some were hoping for Musgrave’s national coming-out party this week – for him to make a strong argument that he should be viewed as a Round 1 candidate. We didn’t get that.
But Musgrave emphatically proved his worth as an NFL prospect. He’ll lock himself into the top-50 picks with a strong showing at the NFL Combine.
Faller: Stanford WR/TE Elijah Higgins
Higgins entered the week trying to prove he could be a matchup problem at the next level at his size. For two days, he struggled to separate in one-on-one drills as a receiver.
Mercilessly, Higgins was moved to the tight end group for Thursday’s practices. This felt less like a choice, more like a mercy-killing of his NFL receiving dreams.
Higgins is lumbering and stiff for a perimeter receiver. He gives tells to defensive backs into route breaks with exaggerated movements, and invites them to every catch point through an inability to accelerate quickly out of cuts.
Unfortunately, for a guy who now has to be viewed as a position convert, Higgins isn’t big or strong enough to try inline anytime soon. For a big slot, his balls skills and downfield body usage are also lacking.
Higgins arrived at the event hoping to prove that he was a versatile weapon who could be used in multiple ways at the NFL-level, first and foremost beating boundary corners. He proved instead that his NFL utility is limited, perhaps a tweener caught between the boundary WR/big slot positions.
Higgins will be picking up the pieces the rest of his process. I’d suggest he gets in the weight room and begins working with tight end coaching specialists immediately.
2023 Senior Bowl Recap: Offensive Linemen
Name | College | Height | Weight | Arm | Hand | Wing |
Asim Richards | North Carolina | 6040 | 307 | 34 1/8 | 10 | 83 1/4 |
Blake Freeland | BYU | 6074 | 312 | 34 | 10 | 82 5/8 |
Cody Mauch | North Dakota State | 6047 | 305 | 32 1/8 | 9 5/8 | 79 3/4 |
Darnell Wright | Tennessee | 6051 | 342 | 34 1/8 | 8 1/2 | 82 3/8 |
Dawand Jones | Ohio State | 6081 | 375 | 36 5/8 | 11 3/8 | 89 1/2 |
Emil Ekiyor Jr. | Alabama | 6022 | 317 | 33 3/8 | 9 3/8 | 82 1/8 |
Jaelyn Duncan | Maryland | 6054 | 298 | 33 1/2 | 9 3/8 | 80 5/8 |
Jake Andrews | Troy | 6026 | 319 | 32 1/4 | 10 1/4 | 78 3/8 |
Jarrett Patterson | Notre Dame | 6047 | 304 | 31 5/8 | 10 | 77 5/8 |
Joey Fisher | Shepherd | 6035 | 292 | 32 | 10 1/4 | N/A |
John Michael Schmitz | Minnesota | 6033 | 306 | 32 3/4 | 9 5/8 | 78 7/8 |
Matthew Bergeron | Syracuse | 6047 | 323 | 33 5/8 | 9 1/2 | 82 3/8 |
McClendon Curtis | Chattanooga | 6056 | 331 | 35 | 10 1/4 | 84 |
Nick Broeker | Mississippi | 6042 | 305 | 32 1/4 | 9 7/8 | 77 3/8 |
Nick Saldiveri | Old Dominion | 6060 | 311 | 33 3/8 | 10 1/2 | 81 3/8 |
O’Cyrus Torrence | Florida | 6047 | 337 | 33 7/8 | 11 1/4 | 84 |
Olusegun Oluwatimi | Michigan | 6025 | 308 | 33 | 8 5/8 | 80 |
Richard Gouraige | Florida | 6047 | 308 | 34 | 10 3/8 | 82 1/8 |
Ryan Hayes | Michigan | 6065 | 305 | 32 3/4 | 10 | 79 1/2 |
Steve Avila | TCU | 6031 | 332 | 32 5/8 | 9 1/4 | 79 |
Tyler Steen | Alabama | 6054 | 325 | 33 | 10 3/4 | 80 1/2 |
Wanya Morris | Oklahoma | 6047 | 317 | 35 3/8 | 10 1/4 | 85 3/4 |
Warren McClendon Jr. | Georgia | 6040 | 290 | 34 | 10 | 80 5/8 |
Rank | Max Speed | Name | College | Max acceleration | Max Deceleration | Explosive efforts | Yards traveled |
1 | 15.05 | Nick Broeker | Mississippi | 3.46 | -3.77 | 2 | 7949 |
2 | 14.71 | Tyler Steen | Alabama | 3.76 | -2.97 | 3 | 6971 |
3 | 14.6 | Warren McClendon Jr. | Georgia | 3.18 | -2.79 | 0 | 5254 |
4 | 14.6 | Matthew Bergeron | Syracuse | 3.11 | -2.95 | 0 | 8752 |
5 | 14.44 | Steve Avila | TCU | 4.23 | -2.73 | 1 | 7401 |
6 | 14.34 | Jovaughn Gwyn | South Carolina | 2.97 | -2.88 | 0 | 2620 |
7 | 13.95 | Asim Richards | UNC | 3.1 | -3.08 | 0 | 7869 |
8 | 13.92 | Ryan Hayes | Michigan | 3.11 | -3.14 | 0 | 7593 |
9 | 13.87 | Richard Gouraige | Florida | 3.61 | -2.66 | 2 | 8438 |
10 | 13.84 | McClendon Curtis | UT-Chatanooga | 2.85 | -3.12 | 0 | 8091 |
11 | 13.83 | Blake Freeland | BYU | 3.72 | -3.38 | 2 | 7665 |
12 | 13.43 | John Michael Schmitz | Minnesota | 3.22 | -3.65 | 2 | 8261 |
13 | 13.3 | Jake Andrews | Troy | 3.2 | -3.5 | 1 | 7795 |
14 | 12.77 | Cody Mauch | North Dakota St. | 2.83 | -3.25 | 1 | 7928 |
15 | 12.73 | Jaelyn Duncan | Maryland | 2.81 | -2.77 | 0 | 7341 |
16 | 12.5 | Wanya Morris | Oklahoma | 3.45 | -2.76 | 2 | 8138 |
17 | 12.06 | Emil Ekiyor Jr. | Alabama | 3.16 | -2.91 | 0 | 7242 |
18 | 11.67 | Olusegun Oluwatimi | Michigan | 2.75 | -2.89 | 0 | 6722 |
19 | 11.47 | Nick Saldiveri | Old Dominion | 3.02 | -3.1 | 0 | 7602 |
20 | 11.32 | Dawand Jones | Oregon St. | 2.45 | -2.97 | 0 | 2227 |
21 | 11.08 | Darnell Wright | Tennessee | 2.96 | -2.79 | 0 | 8638 |
22 | 11.05 | O’Cyrus Torrence | Florida | 2.69 | -3.3 | 1 | 7466 |
23 | 10.51 | Jarrett Patterson | Notre Dame | 2.73 | -2.92 | 0 | 6577 |
Riser: Minnesota iOL John Michael Schmitz
Schmitz told the media in Mobile that he preferred to be referred to as an “interior offensive linemen” during the process as opposed to strictly a center. There are only 32 starting NFL centers. There are 64 starting offensive guards. Schmitz clearly understands supply-and-demand.
And indeed, Schmitz did get some snaps at guard in Senior Bowl practices – proving, in the process, that he has the play strength and tenacity to be left on islands against war-daddy defensive tackles.
Schmitz’s tape at center with the Gophers suggested he had very little left to prove at that position in this event. So some may have wondered why he showed up to Mobile at all.
But it appears Schmitz had a secondary purpose for his pre-draft process: Prove I’m startable immediately at three NFL positions – not just one – and further prove that I’m scheme-diverse, and not just, for instance, of intrigue to center-needy teams in zone-blocking schemes. This is how you increase the pool of teams who might be interested in your services from single-digits to every one of them.
All of this is what made Schmitz’s Senior Bowl week more important than met the eye. He knew his center tape was unimpeachable, and that he’s a very safe NFL prospect at that position. He entered Mobile wanting to prove things that couldn’t be seen on the film.
Mission accomplished. Schmitz consistently impressed in Mobile.
The first thing that stood out about Schmitz during the week is that he’s a practice warrior. Schmitz goes full-boar every rep. His teammates seemed to get more hyped about his wins in one-on-one drills than with others.
True battle-until-the-whistle-blows guy, including on the practice field. We saw this manifest on his game film beforehand – Schmitz will battle back in reps he falls behind through sheer effort. Schmitz’s mobility is high-end, as was apparent on tape – the Gophers had great fun pulling Schmitz and asking him to pick-off second-level defenders.
But Schmitz also acquitted himself very well in one-on-one drills, exercises that are heavily skewed towards the defense. On multiple occasions, stranded on an island, Schmitz utterly stymied ballyhooed interior prospects, eliciting whoops and hollers from his teammates.
This guy is a surefire top-50 pick in April. The cost-certainty is just so high. He’s going to be an above-average starter, at least, in the NFL for a very long time.
After Schmitz’s Senior Bowl week, the first-round talk is no longer a fantasy. He has an opportunity to bolster his case at the NFL Combine, where Schmitz’s movement skills should shine during athletic testing.
Faller: Troy iOL Jake Andrews
Andrews’ week started in dubious fashion. In the week’s first practice, on Tuesday, Andrews had acute issues snapping the ball.
I counted at least three fumbles on center-quarterback exchanges between Andrews and QB Jake Haener. A pair of them occurred out of the shotgun, another one was a botched snap while Haener was under center. On other reps, Haener was consistently fishing errant snaps from outside his frame.
A guard earlier in his career, Andrews shifted to center last year for Troy and took every snap at that position. His snapping issues were curious. Andrews had expressed interest coming into the week of working as both a center and a guard. He got his wish.
But Andrews’ work in one-on-one drills the rest of the week was hit-and-miss – not enough to salvage Tuesday’s showing. On reps Andrews won, you saw tenacity and some ability to anchor.
On the reps Andrews didn’t, he was getting overwhelmed with athleticism or brute strength. He got pushed backwards by bull-rushers. And on multiple occasions, Andrews found himself over-leveraged by a nifty move, a disadvantage he didn’t have the lateral quickness or core strength to dig himself out of.
When an offensive linemen draws attention to himself. It’s usually for the wrong reasons. That was the case for Andrews on Tuesday. He didn’t do enough to dig himself out of the hole on Wednesday or Thursday.
Amid a deep center class in the 2023 draft, Andrews had a lot on the line this week. Unfortunately, he introduced more doubt into his eval than he erased in Mobile.
2023 Senior Bowl Practice Recaps
- Derek Brown’s Senior Bowl Day 1 Risers & Fallers
- Thor Nystrom’s Senior Bowl Day 1 Practice Recap
- Derek Brown’s Senior Bowl Day 2 Risers & Fallers
- Thor Nystrom’s Senior Bowl Day 2 Practice Recap
- Senior Bowl Day 3 Practice Recap, Risers & Fallers
Check out all of our 2023 NFL Draft Scouting Reports & Prospect Profiles
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | SoundCloud | iHeartRadio