Hopefully, if you’re reading this, you’re in your fantasy league playoffs and are inches away from that ring. For those unfamiliar, this weekly article depicts our models that leverage advanced data to hone in on player matchups AND defensive tendencies to predict what WRs are more or less likely to “boom” in a given week. The models take into account everything from height, speed advanced grading, and yards per route run and compare that to the (weighted, expected) corresponding defensive player’s respective data. We mesh that with some defensive tendencies we expect to see, along with how that WR has performed given those splits, and find players to start/sit for the given week.
Let’s jump right in.
Check out all of our weekly fantasy football content
Week 15 Results
We possibly pushed the envelope on the Godwin pick but will take the 3-1 outcome no less.
Name | FP Selection | Projected | Actual | Net |
Garrett Wilson | START | 13.8 | 13.8 | – |
Josh Palmer | START | 7.8 | 9.9 | +2.1 |
Drake London | START | 8.4 | 12.0 | +3.6 |
Chris Godwin | SIT | 15.1 | 22.3 | +7.2 |
DeAndre Hopkins | SIT | 15.2 | 13.0 | -2.2 |
Season Scored Card
Season Record: 52-33
*All stats based on Yahoo Fantasy Football 1/2 PPR
Week 16 WR vs. CB Model Scorecard
Raw Numbers | Weekly Rank | |||||||||
Snaps | Wt.ed Net pprr | 40 Adv. | HT Adv. | nPFFwted Total | Wt.ed Net pprr | 40 Adv. | HT Adv. | nPFFwted Total | Avg. Rk. | |
Christian Watson | 30.9 | 12.6 | 0.12 | 5.58 | 4.5 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 15 |
Davante Adams | 40.0 | 16.6 | 0.03 | 2.03 | 9.8 | 5 | 16 | 40 | 5 | 17 |
Stefon Diggs | 47.8 | 20.0 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 11.4 | 2 | 14 | 59 | 3 | 20 |
Tyler Boyd | 40.8 | 11.3 | 0.02 | 5.01 | 9.4 | 50 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 20 |
Garrett Wilson | 68.0 | 21.9 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 9.5 | 1 | 25 | 49 | 6 | 20 |
Amon-Ra St. Brown | 38.4 | 16.0 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 20.6 | 8 | 25 | 48 | 1 | 21 |
Tee Higgins | 40.8 | 13.3 | 0.00 | 6.94 | 3.2 | 20 | 25 | 1 | 39 | 21 |
D.K. Metcalf | 38.7 | 15.0 | 0.15 | 1.32 | 4.7 | 12 | 3 | 51 | 25 | 23 |
Chris Olave | 46.7 | 16.8 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 7.8 | 4 | 22 | 57 | 10 | 23 |
Ja’Marr Chase | 40.6 | 14.3 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 3.5 | 13 | 25 | 24 | 35 | 24 |
Michael Pittman Jr. | 39.9 | 12.2 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 2.5 | 33 | 25 | 7 | 41 | 27 |
Drake London | 43.7 | 14.1 | 0.00 | 2.87 | 2.6 | 15 | 25 | 27 | 40 | 27 |
A.J. Brown | 41.7 | 16.3 | 0.00 | -1.12 | 8.2 | 7 | 25 | 79 | 9 | 30 |
Jerry Jeudy | 39.5 | 14.0 | 0.04 | 1.64 | 1.9 | 17 | 13 | 45 | 48 | 31 |
Tyreek Hill | 39.4 | 18.9 | 0.00 | -1.08 | 5.6 | 3 | 25 | 77 | 19 | 31 |
Rashid Shaheed | 40.2 | 15.5 | 0.00 | -0.79 | 6.0 | 10 | 25 | 75 | 16 | 32 |
Mack Hollins | 40.1 | 11.0 | 0.05 | 4.71 | 1.7 | 56 | 12 | 8 | 52 | 32 |
Corey Davis | 38.1 | 10.4 | 0.00 | 4.23 | 3.5 | 61 | 25 | 11 | 33 | 33 |
Justin Jefferson | 40.0 | 16.5 | -0.02 | 1.35 | 12.2 | 6 | 73 | 50 | 2 | 33 |
Chase Claypool | 41.3 | 10.9 | 0.09 | 5.00 | 0.7 | 57 | 7 | 6 | 62 | 33 |
DeSean Jackson | 42.1 | 14.0 | 0.06 | -2.36 | 5.1 | 16 | 9 | 88 | 22 | 34 |
Adam Thielen | 40.3 | 11.7 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 3.8 | 44 | 25 | 35 | 31 | 34 |
Equanimeous St. Brown | 40.3 | 10.1 | 0.03 | 6.00 | 1.8 | 69 | 15 | 2 | 51 | 34 |
Randall Cobb | 39.6 | 12.6 | 0.01 | -0.40 | 4.3 | 26 | 21 | 68 | 29 | 36 |
Mike Williams | 41.3 | 11.8 | 0.00 | 4.68 | -0.8 | 40 | 25 | 9 | 71 | 36 |
Brandon Aiyuk | 40.2 | 12.4 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 4.5 | 31 | 23 | 65 | 28 | 37 |
Richie James Jr. | 42.5 | 13.2 | 0.10 | -2.44 | 3.7 | 21 | 6 | 90 | 32 | 37 |
CeeDee Lamb | 41.0 | 14.1 | -0.09 | 3.18 | 4.9 | 14 | 90 | 23 | 23 | 38 |
Amari Cooper | 41.4 | 14.0 | -0.03 | 0.89 | 10.1 | 18 | 77 | 52 | 4 | 38 |
Terrace Marshall Jr. | 39.5 | 10.6 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 3.3 | 60 | 25 | 31 | 38 | 39 |
Isaiah McKenzie | 34.5 | 11.3 | 0.09 | -3.88 | 8.6 | 49 | 8 | 93 | 8 | 40 |
DeVonta Smith | 41.7 | 12.8 | 0.00 | -2.44 | 5.6 | 23 | 25 | 89 | 21 | 40 |
Jaylen Waddle | 39.5 | 15.2 | 0.00 | -0.93 | 1.9 | 11 | 25 | 76 | 47 | 40 |
Allen Lazard | 38.7 | 11.7 | -0.01 | 5.87 | 2.3 | 43 | 70 | 3 | 45 | 40 |
Keenan Allen | 41.0 | 12.4 | -0.03 | 2.43 | 5.6 | 30 | 78 | 33 | 20 | 40 |
Darius Slayton | 40.3 | 12.1 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 35 | 4 | 61 | 64 | 41 |
K.J. Osborn | 40.3 | 10.3 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 7.5 | 64 | 25 | 64 | 12 | 41 |
Jakobi Meyers | 39.2 | 12.5 | -0.08 | 3.94 | 3.5 | 29 | 88 | 14 | 34 | 41 |
DeAndre Hopkins | 41.9 | 15.5 | -0.07 | 0.74 | 6.1 | 9 | 87 | 55 | 15 | 42 |
Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 42.0 | 10.1 | 0.06 | 2.16 | 1.6 | 66 | 11 | 36 | 53 | 42 |
Mike Evans | 40.3 | 11.7 | -0.04 | 4.16 | 3.8 | 45 | 80 | 12 | 30 | 42 |
Terry McLaurin | 39.9 | 12.5 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 1.4 | 27 | 25 | 60 | 55 | 42 |
D.J. Moore | 39.2 | 12.0 | 0.02 | -1.21 | 3.4 | 37 | 17 | 80 | 37 | 43 |
Gabriel Davis | 42.6 | 11.8 | -0.02 | 3.43 | 3.5 | 41 | 74 | 20 | 36 | 43 |
George Pickens | 41.2 | 9.7 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 2.0 | 76 | 25 | 26 | 46 | 43 |
Devin Duvernay | 42.0 | 11.8 | 0.06 | -1.22 | 2.3 | 39 | 10 | 81 | 44 | 44 |
Treylon Burks | 30.0 | 9.4 | 0.00 | 3.70 | 1.4 | 79 | 25 | 16 | 57 | 44 |
D.J. Chark Jr. | 39.2 | 9.4 | 0.02 | 3.37 | 1.4 | 78 | 20 | 22 | 58 | 45 |
DeVante Parker | 39.3 | 10.3 | -0.05 | 3.45 | 7.5 | 62 | 84 | 19 | 13 | 45 |
Curtis Samuel | 38.4 | 12.2 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 1.1 | 34 | 25 | 62 | 60 | 45 |
Donovan Peoples-Jones | 41.4 | 11.5 | -0.07 | 1.87 | 7.2 | 47 | 86 | 43 | 14 | 48 |
Alec Pierce | 38.5 | 9.9 | 0.00 | 3.38 | -1.3 | 73 | 25 | 21 | 75 | 49 |
Zay Jones | 39.9 | 11.0 | 0.00 | 2.04 | -2.7 | 55 | 24 | 39 | 81 | 50 |
JuJu Smith-Schuster | 42.2 | 13.5 | -0.09 | -0.76 | 5.9 | 19 | 92 | 72 | 17 | 50 |
Noah Brown | 41.5 | 10.2 | 0.00 | 2.82 | -3.3 | 65 | 25 | 28 | 84 | 51 |
Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 40.0 | 7.7 | 0.00 | 3.70 | -0.9 | 90 | 25 | 17 | 72 | 51 |
Marquise Brown | 41.8 | 12.5 | 0.00 | -2.61 | 0.7 | 28 | 25 | 91 | 61 | 51 |
Dante Pettis | 41.3 | 10.1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | -1.1 | 68 | 25 | 41 | 73 | 52 |
Chris Godwin | 40.1 | 12.8 | -0.02 | -1.80 | 4.8 | 24 | 75 | 85 | 24 | 52 |
Hunter Renfrow | 40.0 | 9.4 | 0.02 | -0.45 | 2.3 | 77 | 19 | 69 | 43 | 52 |
Parris Campbell | 39.9 | 10.1 | 0.00 | 2.06 | -2.3 | 67 | 25 | 38 | 78 | 52 |
Josh Palmer | 41.2 | 10.0 | 0.00 | 2.67 | -2.8 | 72 | 25 | 30 | 82 | 52 |
Jahan Dotson | 38.7 | 11.2 | 0.00 | -0.14 | -0.5 | 52 | 25 | 66 | 69 | 53 |
Marquise Goodwin | 38.4 | 11.9 | 0.17 | -4.02 | -2.4 | 38 | 2 | 94 | 79 | 53 |
Tutu Atwell | 37.5 | 11.1 | 0.00 | -1.63 | 1.8 | 54 | 25 | 84 | 50 | 53 |
Demarcus Robinson | 42.0 | 12.9 | -0.10 | 0.49 | 2.4 | 22 | 93 | 58 | 42 | 54 |
Robert Woods | 39.7 | 8.5 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 1.4 | 87 | 25 | 47 | 56 | 54 |
Russell Gage | 40.2 | 11.8 | 0.00 | -1.60 | -0.4 | 42 | 25 | 83 | 68 | 55 |
Bennett Skowronek | 38.5 | 7.1 | 0.00 | 4.40 | -6.1 | 94 | 25 | 10 | 90 | 55 |
Chris Moore | 35.2 | 10.0 | -0.01 | 2.22 | 1.9 | 70 | 71 | 34 | 49 | 56 |
Damiere Byrd | 39.0 | 12.1 | 0.00 | -4.85 | -1.1 | 36 | 25 | 95 | 74 | 58 |
Trent Sherfield | 40.0 | 9.8 | 0.00 | 1.92 | -4.7 | 75 | 25 | 42 | 88 | 58 |
Jauan Jennings | 39.3 | 10.0 | -0.04 | 3.68 | 0.6 | 71 | 79 | 18 | 63 | 58 |
Christian Kirk | 39.7 | 12.3 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.5 | 32 | 69 | 67 | 66 | 59 |
Phillip Dorsett | 38.2 | 8.5 | 0.21 | -0.75 | -1.9 | 86 | 1 | 71 | 77 | 59 |
Van Jefferson | 40.2 | 8.7 | 0.00 | 1.78 | -3.8 | 85 | 25 | 44 | 85 | 60 |
Amari Rodgers | 37.9 | 10.8 | 0.00 | -1.35 | -1.7 | 58 | 25 | 82 | 76 | 60 |
Dareke Young | 38.7 | 4.6 | 0.00 | 2.80 | -7.5 | 95 | 25 | 29 | 92 | 60 |
Courtland Sutton | 40.4 | 11.4 | -0.09 | 3.94 | -4.3 | 48 | 91 | 15 | 87 | 60 |
Josh Reynolds | 39.2 | 9.9 | -0.04 | 2.54 | 1.6 | 74 | 81 | 32 | 54 | 60 |
Ray-Ray McCloud III | 39.8 | 8.8 | -0.02 | -0.78 | 7.6 | 84 | 72 | 74 | 11 | 60 |
Marvin Jones Jr. | 39.9 | 8.1 | 0.00 | 2.06 | -7.0 | 89 | 25 | 37 | 91 | 61 |
Diontae Johnson | 41.4 | 11.1 | -0.06 | -2.23 | 5.6 | 53 | 85 | 87 | 18 | 61 |
Quez Watkins | 41.3 | 11.3 | 0.00 | -0.76 | -10.9 | 51 | 25 | 73 | 96 | 61 |
Nelson Agholor | 39.2 | 10.7 | -0.03 | 0.80 | 1.4 | 59 | 76 | 53 | 59 | 62 |
Elijah Moore | 38.4 | 8.9 | 0.00 | -1.11 | 0.6 | 82 | 25 | 78 | 65 | 63 |
Olamide Zaccheaus | 39.2 | 11.6 | 0.00 | -6.43 | -5.6 | 46 | 25 | 96 | 89 | 64 |
Justin Watson | 35.0 | 7.7 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -2.5 | 91 | 25 | 63 | 80 | 65 |
David Bell | 37.3 | 7.7 | -0.26 | 1.60 | 4.6 | 92 | 96 | 46 | 26 | 65 |
A.J. Green | 41.9 | 9.0 | -0.05 | 4.16 | -9.5 | 81 | 83 | 13 | 93 | 68 |
Isaiah Hodgins | 29.9 | 8.4 | -0.15 | 3.02 | -0.7 | 88 | 95 | 25 | 70 | 70 |
Steven Sims | 28.2 | 4.3 | 0.00 | -0.74 | -9.6 | 96 | 25 | 70 | 95 | 72 |
Shi Smith | 39.4 | 8.8 | 0.00 | -2.78 | -9.5 | 83 | 25 | 92 | 94 | 74 |
Michael Gallup | 41.5 | 9.0 | -0.08 | 0.77 | -4.0 | 80 | 89 | 54 | 86 | 77 |
Jarvis Landry | 39.0 | 10.3 | -0.12 | -1.80 | 0.3 | 63 | 94 | 86 | 67 | 78 |
Freddie Swain | 40.5 | 7.2 | -0.05 | 0.59 | -3.2 | 93 | 82 | 56 | 83 | 79 |
*Again, thanks to our friends at PFF for the data
**To standardize all variables we are tracking (and make it easier to read), we included a RANK Display, respective of each data point to the right AND sorted by the average rank across variables.
Legend
- Snaps: estimated total dropback snaps a WR will play in the coming matchup
- Wt.ed Net PPRR: “Weighted Net Fantasy Points/Route Run.” Simply this is the net value of a WR’s PPRR average vs. the DB’s PPRR given up, weighted according to the DB each WR is expected to play.
Example:
- Say Davante Adams averages 2.0 points/route run
- DB1 (expected to face 50% of snaps) gives up 3.0 points/route run
- DB2 (expected to face 30% of snaps) gives up 4.0 points/route run
- DB3 (expected to face 20% of snaps) gives up 1.0 points/route run
This first model would predict Adams to produce 2.45 points/route run (Adams 2.0 vs. aggregate defenders averages weighted to 2.9)
- *40 Adv: “40 Yard Dash Advantage” (weighted difference between WR 40 time and DB’s)
- *HT Adv: “Height Advantage” (same as above, but with height)
- nPFFwted Total: “Net PFF weighted Total Advantage.” Our core model, similar to the Wt.ed Net PPRR above, it compares the PFF grade between WR and likely DB, weighted by expected snaps he’ll see each respective DB
*Not all WRs and DBs have 40 times, and/or height measurements. When this occurs with ONE party, the model ignores the other (i.e., you need a WR and DB with a 40 time for this data point to populate)
Secondary/Bonus Chart
For this week, we included data points/a model to represent the target share CHANGES given specific circumstances (Blitz, Man) we expect the WR to see, given the opponent’s tendencies. As we’ve noted previously, how a QB operates and who he targets can change drastically given the defensive scheme, so keeping the data below in consideration for setting your lineup on a weekly basis is key.
NOTE: For Week 16, I spared you the players within +/-2% change, and the chart below ONLY displays players that have a (relatively) strong indication in either direction
A few notes on the data below:
- ALL stats ignore game scripts of greater than a 16-point differential (either way), the goal line (and from 0-10 yard line), and 4th downs and quarters
- All % next to a WR represent target SHARE given the circumstance (i.e., Nico Collins is seeing 24% of targets without a blitz and 62% when blitzed)
- The first six columns represent how the respective WR performs, along with a “bonus” that’s reflective of target share increasing with Blitz (vs. non-Blitz) and Man (vs. Zone), meaning a negative number is not “bad,” but more so that the WR’s target share gets a bump with no Blitz or Zone respectively.
- The middle columns represent the WR’s opponent’s tendencies, along with a (3rd and 5th row in the middle section) metric for how many percentage points above or below league average THAT defense sends blitz/runs Man.
- The last three columns give an aggregate of how the WR performs relative to coverage and blitz schemes to expect
Player | no blitz | BLITZ | zone | MAN | BLITZ bonus | MAN bonus | Opp | BRAnflAVG | MRAnflAVG | Blitz bonus | Man bonus | net | ||
Tyreek Hill | 43% | 75% | 46% | 49% | 32% | 3% | Packers | 17% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 6% | ||
Justin Jefferson | 62% | 72% | 59% | 71% | 10% | 12% | Giants | 16% | 16% | 2% | 2% | 3% | ||
Romeo Doubs | 5% | 29% | 11% | 12% | 24% | 1% | Dolphins | 11% | 4% | 3% | 0% | 3% | ||
Chris Godwin | 19% | 42% | 25% | 16% | 23% | -9% | Cardinals | 7% | -10% | 2% | 1% | 3% | ||
Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 26% | 16% | 31% | 4% | -10% | -26% | Texans | -6% | -7% | 1% | 2% | 3% | ||
Chris Moore | 31% | 11% | 20% | 20% | -20% | 0% | Titans | -12% | -4% | 2% | 0% | 2% | ||
Cooper Kupp | 38% | 58% | 44% | 35% | 20% | -9% | Broncos | 10% | -2% | 2% | 0% | 2% | ||
Josh Palmer | 36% | 17% | 31% | 19% | -19% | -11% | Colts | -12% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 2% | ||
Brandin Cooks | 31% | 17% | 25% | 17% | -13% | -8% | Titans | -12% | -4% | 2% | 0% | 2% | ||
Darius Slayton | 47% | 68% | 46% | 48% | 21% | 1% | Vikings | -6% | -14% | -1% | 0% | -2% | ||
DeAndre Hopkins | 47% | 39% | 36% | 51% | -7% | 15% | Buccaneers | 6% | -8% | 0% | -1% | -2% | ||
Marvin Jones | 11% | 26% | 18% | 11% | 15% | -7% | Jets | -11% | 0% | -2% | 0% | -2% | ||
Jaylen Waddle | 28% | 23% | 28% | 16% | -6% | -12% | Packers | 17% | 6% | -1% | -1% | -2% | ||
Darnell Mooney | 30% | 56% | 26% | 58% | 26% | 32% | Bills | -4% | -2% | -1% | -1% | -2% | ||
K.J. Osborn | 11% | 3% | 8% | 5% | -8% | -4% | Giants | 16% | 16% | -1% | -1% | -2% | ||
Phillip Dorsett | 18% | 32% | 16% | 20% | 14% | 4% | Titans | -12% | -4% | -2% | 0% | -2% | ||
Allen Lazard | 53% | 29% | 26% | 43% | -25% | 17% | Dolphins | 11% | 4% | -3% | 1% | -2% | ||
Jerry Jeudy | 28% | 30% | 18% | 40% | 2% | 22% | Rams | 3% | -10% | 0% | -2% | -2% | ||
Amari Cooper | 35% | 61% | 38% | 40% | 26% | 2% | Saints | -11% | 10% | -3% | 0% | -3% |
*ONLY WRs with > +- 2% Included in chart above
**Thanks to our friends at Sports Info Solutions and their SIS Database for the info!
***NEW NOTE: the “target share” is not “target ONLY,” but Intended Air Yard share (IAY share) as this gives us a clearer picture not only of the target share but the potential magnitude of said share
****Players that have played on 2 separate teams in 2022 are excluded (as they blur the percentage shares)
WR Matchups to Target in Week 16
*For the matchup sections below, we refrain from “obvious recommendations” and/or players you are starting no matter what (and the opposite for players recommended to sit)
Richie James Jr. (WR – NYG)
Richie burned us earlier in the season, but we still like his outlook this weekend. From a schematic standpoint, James really hasn’t been targeted vs. Man Coverage (9% share), yet sees a 2x share bump (21%) vs. Zone. This is especially significant this week, as the Vikings deploy zone coverage 14% points MORE than the league average. James also comes in with a favorable individual matchup, with a strong speed advantage (4.48 vs. 4.6 40-yard dash) along with respectable Weighted Net Points/Route Run (WNP/RR) and net PFF grade (65 vs. 59.5) vs. likely counterpart Chandon Sullivan (83% expected pass snaps).
Tee Higgins (WR – CIN)
The opponent Patriots are a “Man Defense,” using Cover 1/0 6 percentage points more than the league average. This is a good sign for the veteran WR as his target share nearly doubles from 24% to 46% vs. Man. Additionally, Higgins comes in with our base model’s 7th best individual matchup for the week. This is mainly driven by the #1 height advantage of the week, along with a solid WNP/RR. Higgins standing at 76 inches, dwarfs all likely cover men (Marcus Jones (36%), Myles Bryant (21%), and Jonathan Jones (43%) of expected pass snaps) by at least six inches.
*Tyreek Hill (WR – MIA)
I know I promised to only use “borderline starters” in this section, but we HAD to include Hill here, as we may never have had a stronger indication of predicted stellar performance. Let’s start with the scheme: Hill is quite literally “the guy” that his QB targets when facing a blitz, garnering a whopping 75% target share (vs. 43% without a blitz) when a defense brings 5+. This is big for the young WR, as the Packers send blitz 17% points MORE than the league average. To top that off, our model expects Hill to face Keisean Nixon (51%) in the majority of pass snaps, which bodes well for Hill and his 3.47 WNP/RR vs. Nixon’s 1.39.
WR Matchups to Avoid in Week 16
Jaylen Waddle (WR – MIA)
This fade selection ties in with the previous “start selection” of Hill. Simply put, given the monster share of targets Hill gets vs. blitz and how much the Packers will need to manufacture pressure with said blitz, we believe Waddle will get the short end of the stick for the game as a whole. Beyond that, our model only sees a moderate comparative advantage between Waddle’s (very respectable) 82.6 PFF grade against likely cover men Nixon’s (46% pass snaps) 79 grade and Jaire Alexander‘s (31%) 74.6 grade.
DeAndre Hopkins (WR – ARI)
Yes, for weekly readers, this is a repeat from last week, BUT one that we cashed in on. So we are “going back to the well.” Schematically, as noted last week, Hopkins sees a jump from 36% target share to 51% when facing a blitz. As the Buccaneers bring 5+ 8 percentage points less than the league average, we likely won’t see any “scheme-based boost” for Hopkins here. Not AS important, but still worth noting: Hopkins also comes in with bottom 10% “physical advantages” due to “on-paper” speed and height disadvantages. We have enough of a sample to know “physical disadvantages” don’t really stop Hopkins, but when you consider the scheme disadvantage and the marginal effectiveness compared to OTHER WRs, we’re fading him again this week.
Hopefully, this data helps you build the ideal lineup to propel you through the playoffs! See you all next week.
If you want to dive deeper into fantasy football, be sure to check out our award-winning slate of Fantasy Football Tools as you navigate your season. From our Start/Sit Assistant – which provides your optimal lineup based on accurate consensus projections – to our Waiver Wire Assistant – which allows you to quickly see which available players will improve your team and by how much – we’ve got you covered this fantasy football season.
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | SoundCloud | iHeartRadio