Managing bye weeks is a part of fantasy football, yet this week is especially tough on star WRs. Yes, last week Davante Adams‘ owners were down their key man, but this week with the Bills, Rams, Vikings, and Eagles off on bye. This means that the top 3 WRs in Fantasy Football are out of this week’s lineups, and navigating DFS/starting lineups at the position is especially important. Hopefully, this piece gives you the info you need to make the right decisions.
Week 6 Results
Once again, we puff our chest based on our “record,” but I still don’t think we’ve hit our stride. Last week was very “meh,” and if I had to give it a grade, I would say C-. The Samuel selection hurt (especially for those who started him in 1/2 their leagues).
Managing bye weeks is a part of fantasy football, yet this week is especially tough on star WRs. Yes, last week Davante Adams‘ owners were down their key man, but this week with the Bills, Rams, Vikings, and Eagles off on bye. This means that the top 3 WRs in Fantasy Football are out of this week’s lineups, and navigating DFS/starting lineups at the position is especially important. Hopefully, this piece gives you the info you need to make the right decisions.
Week 6 Results
Once again, we puff our chest based on our “record,” but I still don’t think we’ve hit our stride. Last week was very “meh,” and if I had to give it a grade, I would say C-. The Samuel selection hurt (especially for those who started him in 1/2 their leagues).
Season Scorecard
- Season Record: 28-16
- Total Net Points: 58.6
*All stats based on Yahoo Fantasy Football 1/2 PPR
Week 7 WR vs. CB Model Scorecard
*Again, thanks to our friends at PFF for the data
**To standardize all variables we are tracking (and make it easier to read), we included a RANK Display, respective of each data point to the right AND sorted by the average rank across variables.
Legend
- Snaps: estimated total drop back snaps a WR will play in the coming matchup
- Wt.ed Net PPRR: “Weighted Net Fantasy Points/Route Run”. Simply this is the net value of a WR’s PPRR average vs the DB’s PPRR given up, weighted according to the DB each WR is expected to play.
- Example: Say Davante Adams averages 2.0 points/route run
DB1 (expected to face 50% of snaps) gives up 3.0 points/route run
DB2 (expected to face 30% of snaps) gives up 4.0 points/route run
DB3 (expected to face 20% of snaps) gives up 1.0 points/route run
This first model would predict Adams to produce 2.45 points/route run (Adams 2.0 vs. aggregate defenders averages weighted to 2.9)
- *40 Adv: “40 Yard Dash Advantage” (weighted difference between WR 40 time and DB’s)
- *HT Adv: “Height Advantage” (same as above, but with height)
- nPFFwted Total: “Net PFF weighted Total Advantage.” Our core model, similar to the Wt.ed Net PPRR above, it compares the PFF grade between WR and likely DB, weighted by expected snaps he’ll see each respective DB
*Not all WRs and DBs have 40 times, and/or height measurements. When this occurs with ONE party, the model ignores the other (i.e. you need a WR and DB with a 40 time for this datapoint to populate)
Bonus Chart
With 6 weeks of data, it’s time to look at coverage situations. Given how elastic certain DCs are with their schemes, not to mention the lack of predictability when it comes to DB performance, we find it best to “batch” coverages by:
- Man (M) no blitz (Cover 0, 1 with 4 or fewer rushers)
- Man BLITZ (Cover 0, 1 with 5 or more rushers)
- Zone (Z) no blitz (Cover 2, 3, 4, or 6 with 4 or fewer rushers)
- Zone BLITZ (Cover 2, 3, 4, or 6 with 5 or more rushers)
Then we run a comparison of Target Rate CHANGE among those 4 categories. For example (see below), Zay Jones clearly gets a bump in targets when the defense plays man (6 and 5% regardless of blitz/no blitz), and he’s facing the Giants, who deploy a lot of man (9% more than average, when bringing a blitz in particular). Hence, it’s fair to assume Zay may see a slight bump in expected targets this week.
*Note, as a reminder, this ONLY reflects TARGET RATE (not share), and we only displayed those with a significant bump in either direction. The first segment ‘WR Target Boost” represents how WR target rate changes with that respective Coverage TYPE, and the second is how often the opposing defense deploys the respective Coverage TYPE, relative to league average.
|
|
|
|
WR Target Boost |
Opp COV +/- Use |
|
Player |
|
Team |
OPP |
M no blitz |
M BLITZ |
Z no blitz |
Z BLITZ |
M no blitz |
M BLITZ |
Z no blitz |
Z BLITZ |
Total boost |
Darnell Mooney |
WR |
Bears |
Patriots |
11% |
-13% |
-5% |
7% |
10% |
-6% |
-9% |
4% |
3% |
Zay Jones |
WR |
Jaguars |
Giants |
6% |
5% |
-10% |
-1% |
1% |
9% |
-19% |
9% |
2% |
Amon-Ra St. Brown |
WR |
Lions |
Cowboys |
5% |
21% |
4% |
-29% |
4% |
1% |
1% |
-6% |
2% |
A.J. Green |
WR |
Cardinals |
saints |
12% |
1% |
|
-13% |
7% |
-1% |
3% |
-9% |
2% |
Richie James Jr. |
WR |
Giants |
Jaguars |
-8% |
8% |
|
|
-9% |
6% |
-3% |
6% |
1% |
Noah Brown |
WR |
Cowboys |
Lions |
17% |
5% |
-11% |
-12% |
-2% |
11% |
-17% |
7% |
1% |
Jauan Jennings |
WR |
49ers |
Chiefs |
14% |
-11% |
-18% |
14% |
-2% |
-4% |
-1% |
7% |
1% |
JuJu Smith-Schuster |
WR |
Chiefs |
49ers |
-8% |
1% |
6% |
|
-10% |
2% |
7% |
0% |
1% |
Brandin Cooks |
WR |
Texans |
Raiders |
14% |
0% |
|
-14% |
8% |
-2% |
-6% |
0% |
1% |
Nelson Agholor |
WR |
Patriots |
Bears |
7% |
-6% |
0% |
|
11% |
-3% |
2% |
-10% |
1% |
Mecole Hardman |
WR |
Chiefs |
49ers |
-10% |
14% |
-9% |
5% |
-10% |
2% |
7% |
0% |
1% |
Jerry Jeudy |
WR |
Broncos |
Jets |
-4% |
26% |
-6% |
-16% |
-10% |
-1% |
23% |
-12% |
1% |
Robert Woods |
WR |
Titans |
Colts |
1% |
3% |
-3% |
|
-2% |
-4% |
13% |
-7% |
-1% |
Donovan Peoples-Jones |
WR |
Browns |
Ravens |
8% |
-4% |
-1% |
-3% |
-7% |
0% |
11% |
-4% |
-1% |
Devin Duvernay |
WR |
Ravens |
Browns |
13% |
-6% |
-7% |
|
-3% |
8% |
-3% |
-2% |
-1% |
Jakobi Meyers |
WR |
Patriots |
Bears |
-5% |
3% |
|
3% |
11% |
-3% |
2% |
-10% |
-1% |
Ja’Marr Chase |
WR |
Bengals |
Falcons |
14% |
-6% |
-13% |
5% |
1% |
-3% |
8% |
-5% |
-1% |
DJ Moore |
WR |
Panthers |
Buccaneers |
9% |
5% |
-7% |
-6% |
-7% |
-2% |
-2% |
12% |
-1% |
Shi Smith |
WR |
Panthers |
Buccaneers |
1% |
12% |
-3% |
-10% |
-7% |
-2% |
-2% |
12% |
-1% |
Randall Cobb |
WR |
Packers |
Commanders |
-5% |
1% |
7% |
-4% |
15% |
-1% |
-14% |
1% |
-2% |
Sterling Shepard |
WR |
Giants |
Jaguars |
11% |
-2% |
|
-9% |
-9% |
6% |
-3% |
6% |
-2% |
*thanks to SIS and their datahub for the stats
**All data was taken ONLY during the first three quarters, first three downs, middle 80 yards of the field, and game scripts within +/-16 points
WR Matchups to Target in Week 7
*For the matchup sections below, we refrain from “obvious recommendations” and/or players you are starting no matter what (and the opposite for players recommended to sit)
Darnell Mooney
You likely noticed Mooney sitting atop our “bonus chart” as the only player (in either direction) to hit a “3%” bump based on coverage expectation. This is largely based on his target rate bumping up 11% points when facing a Man Coverage, with no blitz. This deployment is something the Patriots run 3rd most within our sampling. Additionally, Mooney will likely face Myles Bryant (48% coverage snaps expected). Bryant is seeing a decent target share, 15%, but is allowing a 117.1 QBR when targeted and a 51 PFF coverage grade.
Zay Jones
Zay is another WR likely to see a relative bump in targets based on the coverage (type) he’ll likely face vs. the Giants. For whatever reason, Jones is not targeted much when the defense plays vanilla (no blitz, zone), which, indirectly, is great for Jones as the Giants deploy these schemes at the lowest rate in the league (-19% compared to the league average). From a matchup perspective, Jones is middling, yet has one of the better height advantages, putting his 74 inches up against Adoree’ Jackson‘s (40% expected coverage snaps) 71.
George Pickens
Pickens has been a player we have eyed for a few weeks now, as he keeps popping up near the top of our base model. He is this week’s “checks all boxes play.” Yes, there’s some turmoil at the QB position in Pittsburgh, but we believe Pickens has too much going for him not to target him. He comes in with a top 25 rank in all four metrics the model tracks, including a 9th-best Net points per route run (PPRR) grade, buoyed mainly by his shadow, Xavien Howard (53% expected pass snaps). Believe it or not, Howard is giving up 2.08 PPRR, which is considerably higher than Picken’s 1.35.
Others to consider bumping up this week:
- AJ Green
- Amon-Ra St. Brown (duh, but we think he’ll boom)
WR Matchups to Avoid in Week 7
Jakobi Meyers
Meyers sees a slight dip in target rate when the defense goes Man/no blitz (-5%), which the Bears use 11% more than league average. We’re shying away from him this week when you take that, a target rate that has already dropped for 3 straight games (he’s suited up for), and a nagging injury. To top all this, he has our model’s worst speed advantage for the week, putting his 4.63 up against Bears cover men, who all sit between 4.44 and 4.52 in the 40.
Drake London
London has “fallen off” a bit from his hot rookie start, going from 25 targets in his first three games to 18 in the last three. Anecdotally, there may be something of a negative correlation between his opportunities and the Falcons “trying to get star TE Pitts more involved.” However, this “stay away” is based mainly on his likely matchup against Chidobe Aquzie (50% expected coverage snaps). Awuzie is allowing a stifling 58.1 QB Rating when targeted this season.
Others to consider sitting:
- Devin Duvernay
- Diontae Johnson
*Don’t be too worried about Deandre Hopkins’s low ranking on our base chart. This is essentially because his key stats are being read as 0, instead of “N/A” for the week.
With the inclusion of the Coverage Types into our model, we feel great about this week’s selections. We all wish you luck and hope to see you back next week!
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | SoundCloud | iHeartRadio